Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
RV Trip Planning Discussions

Go Back   iRV2 Forums > MOTORHOME FORUMS > Class C Motorhome Discussions
Click Here to Login
Join iRV2 Today

Mission Statement: Supporting thoughtful exchange of knowledge, values and experience among RV enthusiasts.
Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on iRV2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 01-30-2021, 11:53 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Ron Dittmer's Avatar


 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: N/E IL
Posts: 2,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanderso View Post
I added a Hellwig rear sway bar to an E350 Chinook Concourse I used to own and it made a huge difference in reducing sway. It did not make the ride any more harsh. I added Sumos to my 2008 Winnebago View sprinter chassis and it made a big difference in reducing sway. Can’t say how the sumos would help you on an E350, but they were good on the sprinter. If I needed to do it again on a Ford, I’d probably go with the sway bar just due on my prior experience.
Your signature picture shows a pre-2008 chassis. If that was your Chinook Concourse, that means you had "no" rear stabilizer bar of any kind, so adding a heavy duty rear stabilizer bar would have been a night-versus-day difference. Had you done the same, replacing your wimpy front stabilizer bar with a heavy duty version, you would have noticed an even bigger difference because the front heavy duty bar would work in unison with the rear one. So I always say when upgrading, do both front and rear to get the full benefit. Just the rear is much better than doing nothing, but upgrading both is doing it right for a multitude of safety and driver fatigue benefits.
Ron Dittmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 RV Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

iRV2.com RV Community - Are you about to start a new improvement on your RV or need some help with some maintenance? Do you need advice on what products to buy? Or maybe you can give others some advice? No matter where you fit in you'll find that iRV2 is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with other RV owners, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create an RV blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-31-2021, 12:15 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
wanderso's Avatar
 
Fleetwood Owners Club
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,143
Correct Ron. It was my 05 Chinook and it had no rear sway bar prior to installing.
__________________
History:'05 Concord, '08 View, '05 Chinook, '01 Jamboree 24D, '78 Apache Popup, 81 Komfort Tlr,
84 Mazda B2000 'w canopy,Tent from wedding in '96
wanderso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2021, 09:33 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
jackreno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 897
Well I just installed the 1500 lb rated sumo springs today, had to really lift the rv up to get the axle to drop so I could fit the sumo springs, I didn't even use the 1 inch spacers that came with it no need to cause there was no more room, the sumo's by themselves came in to contact with the axle with the rv lifted, it raised my rear around a 1/2 to 3/4 inch once I removed the jack and that was good cause with the 42 gal water tank and 55 gal gas tank [full] that sit behind the axle made the rv squat a little bit.

Only went on a short drive and did notice less sway and less wobble in the back, I will be doing a highway test this weekend at higher speeds to see how it really handles, I also did not notice any ruff ride, maybe cause I went with the lightest load carrying sumo's.

What I really noticed under the rv before installing the sumo's was how the leaf springs look like is was loaded at its max cause the springs were sprung a little down ward, they sit a bit more straight now with the sumo's.

Even though the rv is 2000 lbs under the gross weight [before the 42 gals of fresh water] the back is where most of the weight sits, the fresh water tank should have been forward of the axle.
jackreno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2021, 01:49 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
gladu2's Avatar


 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 266
We had Sumo Springs installed on our 2016 E350 26ft Class C 11,500 lb GVWR, went with 5000 lb rear SSR-106-47-1 and 1000 lb front SSF-106-47 Sumo Springs.Couldn't be happier, eliminated all the sway, porpoising and roll. The RV handles more like a well behaved van now then a lumbering overloaded RV.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	P7920880.JPG
Views:	52
Size:	182.9 KB
ID:	317237   Click image for larger version

Name:	P7920881.JPG
Views:	38
Size:	211.7 KB
ID:	317238  

__________________
History- 1989 Jayco 7ft. slide-in pop-up camper
1998 Winnebago Minnie 22ft Class C Motorhome
2016 Itasca Spirit 25b, 26ft Class C Motorhome
gladu2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2021, 07:51 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Ron Dittmer's Avatar


 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: N/E IL
Posts: 2,447
In my mind, adding Sumo springs for the "sole reason" of improving handling, is addressing the problem in the wrong fashion. The right approach is investing in heavy duty front and rear stabilizer bars.

It's a different situation if your rig "also needs" extra support as jackreno stated. Sumo springs offer a do-it-yourself solution. But even still, why not add a rear leaf spring (or two) in back? If your front needs a lift, why not replace your front coil springs with higher-rated ones? I was quite surprised how easy it is to replace front coil springs. It might be easier than adding Sumo springs.

In my case, the front suspension was over-rated with too much excessive weight margin, confirmed with weigh-ins. The front end was way high and the ride was rough. I replaced the front springs with softer ones which lowered the front by 1.25", something it needed. Doing so raised the rear bumper by about the amount jackreno achieved with his Sumo springs.

Here was my front with the original over-rated coil springs. It was dang high, looking like a 4x4.


Here it is with the lower-rated front coil springs, the front lowered by 1.25" and the ride much nicer. These springs are a better match to the actual weight. This better levelled the rig and raised the rear bumper a little bit too.

I compared the spring specs of my particular E350 chassis to the E450 chassis of the same model year. They have the same Super Duty front coil springs. That got me investigating to determine if I had too much spring up front for my actual weight, and I surely did.
Ron Dittmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2021, 02:59 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
jackreno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladu2 View Post
We had Sumo Springs installed on our 2016 E350 26ft Class C 11,500 lb GVWR, went with 5000 lb rear SSR-106-47-1 and 1000 lb front SSF-106-47 Sumo Springs.Couldn't be happier, eliminated all the sway, porpoising and roll. The RV handles more like a well behaved van now then a lumbering overloaded RV.
I went with the 1500 lb Sumo's on back cause I didn't want a hard ride, did the 5000 lb Sumo's in back make the ride hard, they also have a 2800 lb Sumo for the E-350.

I also wonder if I went to lite of Sumo's in back.
jackreno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2021, 11:37 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
jackreno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 897
Update :

I did some highway driving with the Sumo springs, the ride had very little sway and even the steering was even better, the back sits up almost a inch higher, even took some sharp turns and the RV had very little roll and so far could not feel any harsher ride.

I would say the improvement was a 4 out of 5, I might add some upgraded sway bars in the future to finish it off and new Koni shocks when the new shocks start to wear out.

I think going with the 1500 lb rate Sumo's saved me from a possible harsh ride in back, glad I went with the lower weight rating Sumo's.
jackreno is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Front springs sagging / Sumo Springs??? bruceh Workhorse and Chevrolet Chassis Motorhome Forum 2 07-09-2014 03:42 PM
Need advice - 1500 lbs lite SUV tow limit web_diva Pop Up, Tent Trailer and Teardrop Topics 30 09-20-2013 07:58 PM
Trailer brakes needed 2800 lbs? Dynadave Toads and Motorhome Related Towing 4 03-28-2013 11:17 AM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.